CategoriesUncategorized

Therapeutic usage of sexual dolls and robots

Therapeutic usage of sexual dolls and robots

Clinicians’ views are different. Some therapists, drawing on case studies from the beginning they explain that living with a love-doll (as people who own dolls prefer to refer to them) can be an effective and healing process following traumatizing experiences, particularly when it is accompanied by a professionals who provide therapeutic monitoring. Others clinical authors caution their colleagues about the fact that the sex robotic industry’s products are advertised with misleading health claims. More heated are controversy over child sex dolls made in Asia and distributed around the globe. Some psychologists and ethicists suggest that individuals with paedophilic tendencies might use these dolls or robots as surrogates to stop the perpetrators of real child sexual abuse and their therapeutic use is beneficial. Some ethicists and therapists oppose the idea in its entirety and advise that child sex toys or robots pose a risk since they encourage and normalize child sexual abuse for paedophiles as well as the general public. Legal bans on child sex toys as well as robots aren’t only being advocated for (Campaign against Sex Robots) however, in some countries they are on the way or are currently in effect (e.g. legislation like the Curbing Realistic Experimentation Electronic Robot Act 2017 (the CREEPER Act 2017 short for CREEPER Act for the US) .

There are also conflicting strategies evident in the clinical, ethical as well as legal discussions. Should sex robots and sex dolls of all sorts be considered as potential therapeutic tools within the context of different sexual diseases? Should certain types be immediately rescinded, suggesting that new sexual infidelity involving robots and dolls have been created and must be punished?

Leave a Reply